Association of COVID-19 Vaccination Rates and Facility Characteristics on COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations, and Deaths in US Nursing Homes.

OBJECTIVES: Nursing home residents have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite recognition as a priority group for receipt of the COVID-19 vaccine, vaccine uptake and COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in nursing home facilities were variable across nursing homes. This study has 2 objectives: (1) to describe nursing facility characteristics associated with higher vs lower vaccination rates and (2) to estimate facility characteristics associated with COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, stratified by vaccination rate. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Facility-level data from 12,811 US nursing home facilities. METHODS: Using the CMS's Nursing Home COVID-19 Public File, we analyzed nursing home COVID-19 vaccination rates and outcomes from June 13, 2021, to September 19, 2021. We performed multivariable logistic regressions and identified facility characteristics associated with increased vaccination uptake and COVID-19 outcomes. RESULTS: Nursing homes with average vaccination rates ≤80% experienced higher total average COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths compared to facilities with >80% average vaccination rates during the Delta surge. Moreover, facility factors, such as higher average age of residents, proportion of non-white residents, nurse staffing hours, and occupancy rates, were variably associated with increased risk of COVID-19 outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Facilities with higher resident vaccination rates experienced lower average COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in US nursing homes. Access to vaccines may play a role in mitigating harm associated with infectious diseases. Additionally, facility factors associated with increased adverse outcomes were variably associated with increased odds of COVID-19 outcomes, often, irrespective of vaccination level. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve and as the possibility of other infectious disease variants emerge, this research provides insight into facility factors, including vaccine uptake, that may mitigate adverse outcomes.

Direct Medical Costs of COPD in the USA: An Analysis of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2017-2018.

AIM: In this study, we aimed to provide a nationally representative estimate of the economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by examining direct medical costs among individuals aged 45 years and older in the USA. METHODS: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2017-2018) data were used to estimate the direct medical costs associated with COPD. All-cause (unadjusted) cost and COPD-specific (adjusted) cost were determined for the various service categories using a regression-based approach among patients with COPD. We developed a weighted two-part model and adjusted for various demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 23,590 patients, of which 1073 had COPD. Patients with COPD had a mean age of 67.4 years (standard error (SE): 0.41), and the total all-cause mean medical cost per patient per year (PPPY) was 2018 US $19,449 (SE: US $865), of which US $6145 (SE: US $295) was for prescription drugs. Using the regression approach, the mean total COPD-specific cost was US $4322 (SE: US $577) PPPY, with prescription drugs contributing US $1887 (SE: 216) PPPY. These results represented an annual total COPD-specific cost of US $24.0 billion, with prescription drugs contributing US $10.5 billion. The mean annual out-of-pocket spending accounted for 7.5% (mean: US $325) of the total COPD-specific cost; for COPD-specific prescription drug cost, 11.3% (mean: US $212) was out-of-pocket cost. CONCLUSION: COPD poses a significant economic burden on healthcare payers and patients 45 years of age and older in the USA. While prescription drugs accounted for almost half of the total cost, more than 10% of the prescription drug cost was out-of-pocket.

Unintended impacts of a national antipsychotic reduction initiative among nursing facility residents with and without Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: In July 2012, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services launched an antipsychotic reduction initiative (ARI) to improve care for nursing facility residents with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). We examined the impact of this policy on antipsychotic and psychotropic medication (PM) utilization and diagnosis patterns in long-stay nursing facility residents with ADRD and other conditions in which antipsychotics are indicated. METHODS: Using an 80% sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with Part D, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of nursing facility residents with ADRD, bipolar disorder, psychosis, Parkinson's disease, and residents exempt from the policy due to diagnoses of schizophrenia, Tourette syndrome, and/or Huntington's disease. We used interrupted time-series analyses to compare changes in diagnoses, antipsychotic use, and PM utilization before (January 1, 2011-June 30, 2012) and after (July 1, 2012-September 30, 2015) ARI implementation. RESULTS: We identified 874,487 long-stay nursing facility residents with a diagnosis of ADRD (n = 358,518), exempt (n = 92,859), bipolar (n = 128,298), psychosis (n = 93,402), and Parkinson's disease (n = 80,211). In all cohorts, antipsychotic use declined prior to the ARI; upon policy implementation, antipsychotic use reductions were sustained throughout the study period, including statistically significant ARI-associated accelerated declines in all cohorts. PM changes varied by cohort, with ARI-associated increases in non-benzodiazepine sedatives and/or muscle relaxants noted in ADRD, psychosis, and Parkinson's cohorts. Although anticonvulsant use increased throughout the study period in all groups, with the exception of the bipolar cohort, these increases were not associated with ARI implementation. Findings are minimally explained by increased post-ARI membership in the psychosis and Parkinson's cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our study documents antipsychotic use significantly declined in non-ADRD clinical and exempt cohorts, where such reductions may not be clinically warranted. Furthermore, ARI-associated compensatory increases in PMs do not offset these reductions. Changes in PM utilization and diagnostic make-up of residents using PMs require further investigation to assess the potential for adverse clinical and economic outcomes.

Family history of substance use disorder and likelihood of prescription drug misuse in adults 50 and older.

OBJECTIVE: Individuals who are family history positive (FHP) for substance use problems have increased risk for substance use, substance use disorders (SUDs), and psychopathology. Links between FHP status and prescription drug misuse (PDM) have not been well investigated; this study examined PDM in adults 50 and older by FHP status. METHODS: Data were from the US NESARC-III (n = 14,667). Participants reported their opioid PDM, tranquilizer/sedative PDM, SUD, psychopathology, and family history status (i.e. first- and second-degree relatives with alcohol/substance use problems). Prevalence rates were estimated by FHP status, and logistic regressions compared FHP and family history negative (FHN) groups. RESULTS: FHP status was associated with significantly higher rates of PDM (e.g. past-year opioid PDM, FHP: 3.8%, FHN: 1.5%) and SUD from PDM (e.g. past-year SUD, FHP: 1.2%, FHN: 0.2%); also, prevalence varied by family history density, with the highest rates in those with three or more relatives with substance use problems (e.g. past-year opioid PDM: 5.5%). Overall, 32.2% of FHP individuals with past-year PDM had past-year co-occurring SUD and psychopathology diagnoses, versus 11.0% of FHN individuals. CONCLUSION: FHP status could inform treatment decisions in adults 50 and older with conditions for which prescription opioids or tranquilizer/sedatives are indicated.

Examining transitions of care among nursing home residents with and without antipsychotic medication use.

OBJECTIVES: This study examines the association between antipsychotic (AP) medication use and care transitions in the nursing home (NH) population. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries between 2011 and 2015. Propensity score adjusted negative binomial regression was performed and conditional probabilities of having a first transition from the NH to specific locations were calculated. RESULTS: Among 150,284 eligible beneficiaries, the majority were female (67%), white (84%), and >75 years old (63%). Controlling for resident characteristics, the odds of having any transition was 5% lower among those with AP use [IRR (95% confidence interval (CI))=0.95(0.94-0.96)] relative to those with no AP use. Residents with AP use had higher proportions of transitions to hospital (22.7% vs. 19.5%, p < 0.01), emergency department (19.6% vs. 10.7%, p < 0.01), and different NH (1.5% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.01), and lower proportions of transition to non-healthcare locations compared to those without AP use. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate that residents with AP use had higher probabilities of transitions to more costly care settings such as the emergency department and hospital compared to those without AP use. Future longitudinal studies will help to inform clinical interventions aimed at improving the quality of care for this population.

Patient Outcomes After Delirium Screening and Incident Alzheimer's Disease or Related Dementias in Skilled Nursing Facilities.

BACKGROUND: The extent to which a positive delirium screening and new diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease or related dementias (ADRD) increases the risk for re-hospitalization, long-term nursing home placement, and death remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term outcomes among newly admitted skilled nursing facility (SNF) patients with delirium, incident ADRD, and both conditions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries who entered a SNF from hospital with a minimum 14-day stay (n = 100,832) from 2015 to 2016. MAIN MEASURES: Return to home, hospital readmission, admission to a long-term care facility, or death. KEY RESULTS: Patients with delirium were as likely to be discharged home as patients diagnosed with ADRD (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.67; HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.67). Patients with both delirium and ADRD were less likely to be discharged home (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.52) and showed increased risk of death (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.45). Patients with ADRD, regardless of delirium screening status, had increased risk for long-term nursing home care transfer (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.63, 1.70; HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.69, 1.82). Patients with delirium and no ADRD showed increased risk of transfer to long-term nursing home care (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.33). The rate of deaths was higher among patients who screened positive for delirium without ADRD compared to the no delirium and no ADRD groups (HR: 2.35, 95% CI: 2.11, 2.61). CONCLUSION: A positive delirium screening increased risk of death and transfer to long-term care in the first 100 days after admission regardless of incident ADRD diagnosis. Patients with delirium and/or ADRD also are less likely to be discharged home. Our study builds on the evidence base that delirium is important to address in older adults as it is associated with negative outcomes.

Racial Disparities in Nursing Home Resident and Staff COVID-19 Vaccination Rates.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether staff and resident COVID-19 vaccination rates varied by racial heterogeneity of nursing homes, defined as proportion of residents who are White. METHODS: Cross-sectional study using data from the Medicare COVID-19 Nursing Home Database and LTCFocus.org to examine facility-level resident and staff vaccination status. General linear regression models assessed analyses of variance and tests for trend on proportion of residents and staff fully vaccinated as of June 13, 2021 by proportion of White residents in each facility. RESULTS: Over 12,000 (n=12,278) nursing homes provided resident measures and 8,838 reported staff measures. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) resident vaccination rate of nursing homes in the lowest and highest quantiles of White residents was significantly different at 72.74% (20.59%) and 85.65% (16.70%), respectively. Staff vaccination rates of nursing homes in the lowest and highest quantiles of White residents were not significantly different at 58.34% (25.09%) and 56.06% (19.32%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A higher proportion of White residents per facility was associated with higher resident COVID-19 vaccination rates reflecting continued disparities in quality of care during the pandemic.

Patterns of opioid use in commercially insured patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVES: In an era of heightened opioid prescribing scrutiny, ensuring safe and adequate pain management is challenging. Understanding opioid use in patients with cancer can facilitate effective pain management regimens while minimizing safety concerns. This study characterized patterns of and factors associated with opioid use following a new cancer diagnosis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Our study included patients with a new cancer diagnosis aged 18 to 64 years in IQVIA PharMetrics Plus 2007-2013 who were continuously enrolled 12 months before receiving their cancer diagnosis and 24 months after. Study outcomes included opioid prevalence and measures of potentially high-risk opioid use (total days supplied, number of prescriptions, and morphine equivalent daily dose [MEDD]). Descriptive analyses and logistic regression were implemented. RESULTS: Of 191,616 eligible individuals, 93,739 (48.9%) received opioid prescriptions; of these, 56,025 (59.8%) were new opioid users. Opioid users received 4.6 prescriptions on average, covering 65 total days with a mean MEDD of 31.8 mg. Only 2387 (2.5%) patients received higher than recommended (≥ 90 mg) MEDD. Predictors of opioid use post cancer included prior opioid use, select comorbidities, use of nonopioid pain treatment adjuvants (muscle relaxants, sedative/hypnotics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and steroids), cancer site, and metastatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than half of patients received opioids in the 2 years following cancer onset. Among users, we found a relatively small proportion of potentially problematic opioid use. Further research is warranted to assess the adequacy of cancer pain treatment and determinants of high-risk opioid use.

Prediction of treatment nonadherence among older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using Medicare real-world data.

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal maintenance medication (MM) adherence remains a clinical problem among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVE: To inform risk-based personalized decision-making, this study sought to develop and validate prediction models of nonadherence to COPD MMs for Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of beneficiaries aged 65 years and older with COPD and inhaled MMs. Nonadherence (proportion of days covered < 0.8) was measured in 12 months following the first MM fill after COPD diagnosis. Logistic and least absolute shrinkage selector operator regressions were implemented, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) evaluated model accuracy, as well as positive predictive values and negative predictive values. Our models evaluated different sets of predictors for two cohorts: those with an MM prescription before COPD diagnosis (prevalent users) and those without (new users). RESULTS: Among 16,157 prevalent and 40,279 new users of MMs, 11,271 (69.8%) and 34,009 (84.4%), respectively, were nonadherent. The best-performing logistic models achieved AUROCs of 0.8714 and 0.881, positive predictive values of 0.881 and 0.881, and negative predictive values of 0.559 and 0.578, respectively, for prevalent and new users. The least absolute shrinkage selector operator models had similar accuracy. Models with baseline-only predictors had average performance (AUROC < 0.72). The most important predictors were initial MM adherence, short-acting bronchodilator use, and asthma. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study is the first to develop predictive models of nonadherence to COPD MMs. Generated models achieved good discrimination and underlined the importance of early adherence. Well-performed models can be useful for care decision-making and interventions to improve COPD medication adherence after the first critical few months following a treatment episode. DISCLOSURES: All authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Adverse outcomes associated with concurrent gabapentin, opioid, and benzodiazepine utilization: A nested case-control study.

Background: Gabapentin, opioids, and/or benzodiazepines are commonly prescribed for a variety of pain and psychiatric conditions. Despite the high likelihood of co-prescription of these medications, little is known about co-utilization of gabapentin (GABA), opioids (OP), and benzodiazepines (BZD) and associated public health outcomes. Methods: Using Medicare CCW Data, 2013-2016, we conducted a nested case-control study to examine the association between concurrent utilization of GABA, OP, and BZD and respiratory depression, opioid, and substance-related overdose among Medicare disabled beneficiaries. Cases and controls were Fee-for-service disabled beneficiaries who had a diagnosis of acute pain (AP), chronic pain (CP) or mental health conditions (MH) and received GABA, OP or BZD. Cases with respiratory depression, opioid or substance-related overdose were matched with up to 4 controls on socio-demographics, year of cohort entry and disease risk score. Primary exposure was concurrent medication utilization defined as an overlap of at least one day in prescriptions for GABA, OP and BZD. Findings: Across all cohorts, the majority of cases and controls were under 65, female, dually eligible and had prior histories of pain and mental health conditions. GABA+OP+BZD use was associated with increased odds of respiratory depression [AOR(95%CI)-AP: 1.35 (1.19-1.52), CP:1.24 (1.11-1.38) and MH: 1.16 (1.02-1.32) vs. OP only], opioid-related overdose [AP: 1.43 (1.04-1.98), CP: 1.47 (1.07-2.00) and MH: 1.44 (1.04-2.00) vs. OP only], and substance-related overdose [AP: 1.77 (1.26-2.50), CP: 1.70 (1.24-2.34) and MH: 1.92 (1.31-2.82) vs. GABA only]. While there were cohort differences in the association between GABA+OP and both respiratory depression and opioid-related overdose, GABA+OP and GABA+BZD use were associated with significantly higher odds of substance-related overdose across all clinical cohorts. Interpretation: Among Medicare disabled beneficiaries, concurrent utilization of gabapentin, opioids, and benzodiazepines is associated with multiple adverse outcomes. Given this, it is imperative that the benefits and risks of co-prescribing these medications be comprehensively examined. Funding: None.

Patterns of opioid and benzodiazepine use with gabapentin among disabled Medicare beneficiaries - A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to describe specific patterns associated with co-prescriptions of gabapentin, opioids, and benzodiazepines among disabled Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: Using 2013-2015 Medicare data, we conducted a retrospective cohort study among fee-for-service disabled beneficiaries continuously enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D. The index date was defined as the earliest fill date for a gabapentin, opioid, or benzodiazepine prescription. Monotherapy, dual therapy, and tri-therapy were defined as utilization of one, two, and three medication classes, respectively. Augmentation was defined as a prescription for a different medication class in addition to prescription for initial medication; switching referred to a change in prescription for a different medication class with no subsequent fills of initial medication. We used descriptive statistics, Kaplan Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards to examine the association between initial therapy and monotherapy, dual therapy, tri-therapy, switching and augmentation. RESULTS: Among 151,552 disabled beneficiaries, gabapentin initiators were more likely to augment therapy (50.1%) when compared to opioid (28.7%) and benzodiazepine (38.7%) users. When compared to opioid initiators, the risk of augmentation (HR[95%CI]: 1.85[1.82-1.89]) and switching (1.62 [1.51-1.73]) was significantly higher among gabapentin initiators. Risk of augmentation was also significantly higher among beneficiaries with co-morbid pain and mental health conditions (p < 0.01). Overall, the majority of beneficiaries augmented and switched within 2-months and 4-months after initiating therapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Given safety concerns associated with gabapentin, opioids, and benzodiazepines, it is imperative that the benefits and risks of co-prescribing these medications be examined comprehensively, especially for those in vulnerable sub-groups.

Query mandates in prescription drug monitoring programs reduce opioid use among commercially insured patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) have been shown to reduce opioid use in the general and noncancer populations. However, evidence of PDMP impacts on patients with cancer remains limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine the impact of PDMP mandates on individual-level opioid use among patients with cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed cancer aged 18-65 years in the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database (IQVIA Inc; nationally representative data of the U.S. commercially insured population in 49 states) between 2013 and 2015. The primary exposure was PDMP rigor (ranked from highest to lowest rigor): provider query + registration, query only, registration only, and unexposed. The study outcomes included (1) prevalent use among all individuals; and among opioid users (2) total days supplied, (3) daily morphine equivalent dose (MED), and (4) cumulative MED. RESULTS: Of the eligible cohort (n=28,353), 37.5% (10,656) received opioids after a cancer diagnosis. The individuals exposed to these mandates were as follows: query + registration: 3899 (13.8%); query only: 3459 (12.2%); registration only: 2764 (9.7%); and no mandates: 18,231 (64.3%). The PDMP mandates had no effect on prevalent opioid use. Compared with unexposed patients, those subject to query mandates-alone or with registration mandates-experienced 12 fewer opioid days supplied and a lower mean cumulative MED (-662 mg and -702 mg, respectively), P < 0.01. Registration-only mandates were associated with 21 days more (P < 0.01) total days supplied and lower daily MED (1.1 mg; P < 0.05) but had no statistically significant effect on cumulative MED (-46 mg, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Query mandates are a stronger PDMP tool than registration mandates in reducing opioid days supplied and cumulative MED. Initiatives should target PDMP mandates toward intended patient groups to reduce high-risk opioid use without compromising adequate pain treatment.

Staffing and Protective Equipment Access Mitigated COVID-19 Penetration and Spread in US Nursing Homes During the Third Surge.

OBJECTIVES: During the last quarter of 2020-despite improved distribution of personal protective equipment (PPE) and knowledge of COVID-19 management-nursing homes experienced the greatest increases in cases and deaths since the pandemic's beginning. We sought to update COVID-19 estimates of cases, hospitalization, and mortality and to evaluate the association of potentially modifiable facility-level infection control factors on odds and magnitude of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in nursing homes during the third surge of the pandemic. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Facility-level data from 13,156 US nursing home facilities. METHODS: Two series of multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear models to examine the association of infection control factors (personal protective equipment and staffing) on incidence and magnitude, respectively, of confirmed COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in nursing home residents reported in the last quarter of 2020. RESULTS: Nursing homes experienced steep increases in COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths during the final quarter of 2020. Four-fifths (80.51%; n = 10,592) of facilities reported at least 1 COVID-19 case, 49.44% (n = 6504) reported at least 1 hospitalization, and 49.76% (n = 6546) reported at least 1 death during this third surge. N95 mask shortages were associated with increased odds of at least 1 COVID-19 case [odds ratio (OR) 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.40] and hospitalization (1.26, 95% CI 1.13-1.40), as well as larger numbers of hospitalizations (1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20). Nursing aide shortages were associated with lower odds of at least 1 COVID-19 death (1.23, 95% CI 1.12-1.34) and higher hospitalizations (1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17). The number of nursing hours per resident per day was largely insignificant across all outcomes. Of note, smaller (<50-bed) and midsized (50- to 150-bed) facilities had lower odds yet higher magnitude of all COVID outcomes. Bed occupancy rates >75% increased odds of experiencing a COVID-19 case (1.48, 95% CI 1.35-1.62) or death (1.25, 95% CI 1.17-1.34). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Adequate staffing and PPE-along with reduced occupancy and smaller facilities-mitigate incidence and magnitude of COVID-19 cases and sequelae. Addressing shortcomings in these factors is critical to the prevention of infections and adverse health consequences of a next surge among vulnerable nursing home residents.

Prevalence and Newly Diagnosed Rates of Multimorbidity in Older Medicare Beneficiaries with COPD.

Few studies have quantified the multimorbidity burden in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using large and generalizable data. Such evidence is essential to inform evidence-based research, clinical care, and resource allocation. This retrospective cohort study used a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older with COPD and 1:1 matched (on age, sex, and race) non-COPD beneficiaries to: (1) quantify the prevalence of multimorbidity at COPD onset and one-year later; (2) quantify the rates [per 100 person-years (PY)] of newly diagnosed multimorbidity during in the year prior to and in the year following COPD onset; and (3) compare multimorbidity prevalence in beneficiaries with and without COPD. Among 739,118 eligible beneficiaries with and without COPD, the average number of multimorbidity was 10.0 (SD = 4.7) and 1.0 (SD = 3.3), respectively. The most prevalent multimorbidity at COPD onset and at one-year after, respectively, were hypertension (70.8% and 80.2%), hyperlipidemia (52.2% and 64.8%), anemia (42.1% and 52.0%), arthritis (39.8% and 47.7%), and congestive heart failure (CHF) (31.3% and 38.8%). Conditions with the highest newly diagnosed rates before and following COPD onset, respectively, included hypertension (39.8 and 32.3 per 100 PY), hyperlipidemia (22.8 and 27.6), anemia (17.8 and 20.3), CHF (16.2 and 13.2), and arthritis (12.9 and 13.2). COPD was significantly associated with increased odds of all measured conditions relative to non-COPD controls. This study updates existing literature with more current, generalizable findings of the substantial multimorbidity burden in medically complex older adults with COPD-necessary to inform patient-centered, multidimensional care.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2021.1968815 .

Effects of Prescription Opioid Use on Traumatic Brain Injury Risk in Older Adults.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of traumatic brain injury (TBI) associated with opioid use among older adult Medicare beneficiaries. SETTING: Five percent sample of Medicare administrative claims obtained for years 2011-2015. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 50 873 community-dwelling beneficiaries 65 years and older who sustained TBI. DESIGN: Case-crossover study comparing opioid use in the 7 days prior to TBI with the control periods of 3, 6, and 9 months prior to TBI. MAIN MEASURES: TBI cases were identified using ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision) and ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) codes. Prescription opioid exposure and concomitant nonopioid fall risk-increasing drug (FRID) use were determined by examining the prescription drug event file. RESULTS: The 8257 opioid users (16.2%) were significantly younger (mean age 79.0 vs 80.8 years, P < .001). Relative to nonusers, opioid users were more likely to be women (77.0% vs 70.0%, P < .001) with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2 or more (43.7% vs 30.9%, P < .001) and higher concomitant FRID use (94.0% vs 82.7%, P < .001). Prescription opioid use independently increased the risk of TBI compared with nonusers (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.28-1.40). In direct comparisons, we did not observe evidence of a significant difference in adjusted TBI risk between high- (≥90 morphine milligram equivalents) and standard-dose opioid prescriptions (OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90-1.14) or between acute and chronic (≥90 days) opioid prescriptions (OR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.84-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: Among older adult Medicare beneficiaries, prescription opioid use independently increased risk for TBI compared with nonusers after adjusting for concomitant FRID use. We found no significant difference in adjusted TBI risk between high-dose and standard-dose opioid use, nor did we find a significant difference in adjusted TBI risk between acute and chronic opioid use. This analysis can inform prescribing of opioids to community-dwelling older adults for pain management.

Prescription Tranquilizer/Sedative Misuse Motives Across the US Population.

OBJECTIVES: Roughly 6.5 million US residents engaged in prescription tranquilizer/sedative (eg, benzodiazepines, Z-drugs) misuse in 2018, but tranquilizer/sedative misuse motives are understudied, with a need for nationally representative data and examinations of motives by age group. Our aims were to establish tranquilizer/sedative misuse motives and correlates of motives by age cohort, and whether motive-age cohort interactions existed by correlate. METHODS: Data were from the 2015 to 2018 US National Survey on Drug Use and Health, with 223,520 total respondents (51.5% female); 6580 noted past-year prescription tranquilizer/sedative misuse motives (2.4% overall, 50.3% female). Correlates included substance use (eg, opioid misuse), mental (eg, suicidal ideation) and physical health variables (e.g., inpatient hospitalization). Design-based, weighted cross-tabulations and logistic regression analyses were used, including analyses of age cohort-motive interactions for each correlate. RESULTS: Prescription tranquilizer/sedative misuse motives varied by age group, with the highest rates of self-treatment only motives (ie, sleep and/or relax) in those 65 and older (82.7%), and the highest rates of any recreational motives in adolescents (12-17 years; 67.5%). Any tranquilizer/sedative misuse was associated with elevated odds of substance use, mental health, and physical health correlates, but recreational misuse was associated with the highest odds. Age-based interactions suggested stronger relationships between tranquilizer/sedative misuse and mental health in adults 50 and older. CONCLUSIONS: Any tranquilizer/sedative misuse signals a need for substance use and mental health screening, with intervention needs most acute in those with any recreational motives. Older adult tranquilizer/sedative misuse may be more driven by undertreated insomnia and anxiety/psychopathology than in younger groups.

Opioid-involved prescription drug misuse and poly-prescription drug misuse in U.S. older adults.

OBJECTIVES: Although older adult prescription drug misuse (PDM) is associated with concerning consequences, stimulant PDM and poly- PDM involving multiple medication classes each remain understudied. Our objectives were to examine PDM and poly-PDM prevalence by medication class in US older adults and to identify the mental health, SUD, and health-related quality-of-life correlates of poly-PDM. METHOD: Data were from adults 50 and older completing the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III, (N = 14,667). Prevalence of PDM and poly-PDM by medication class was estimated. Logistic regression established odds of four SUD diagnoses, five psychopathology diagnoses and lifetime suicide attempts; linear regression evaluated health-related quality-of-life by PDM/poly-PDM status. RESULTS: Past-year PDM abstinence increased with age (50-54 years: 80.5%; 80 and older: 96.0%), while poly-PDM declined; past-year stimulant PDM was rare (≤0.6%), except when combined with opioid and tranquilizer/sedative PDM. Compared to no past-year PDM, both past-year opioid-only PDM and opioid-involved poly-PDM were associated with poorer health-related quality-of-life and greater odds of psychopathology and SUD, with the highest odds in poly-PDM. CONCLUSION: The presence of any opioid-involved PDM in older adults highlights screening for SUD, psychopathology, and other medical conditions, with the most significant intervention needs likely in those with opioid-involved poly-PDM.

Patterns of prescription opioid utilization among adolescents and adults with comorbid chronic pain and mental health diagnosis.

Our goal was to examine the association between mental health disorders (MHD) and subsequent risk of opioid use among commercially insured youth and adults (aged 14-64 years) with comorbid chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) conditions. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using IQVIA Health Plan Claims database from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2015. Chronic noncancer pain was defined as any diagnosis of back, head, neck, arthritis, or chronic pain (index date). Mental health disorders were assessed in the 12 months before the index pain diagnosis. Based on days supply (none, acute, and chronic) and average daily dose (none, low, medium, and high), we constructed a 7-level categorical dependent measure of opioid use. We estimated the overall prevalence of MHD and opioid receipt. Among those with CNCP, multinomial logistic regression (AOR; 95 confidence interval) was used to estimate the association of MHD with opioid receipt. Among 879,815 individuals diagnosed with CNCP, 143,923 (16.4%) had comorbid MHD. Chronic/high-dose use of opioids was more common among those with CNCP and MHD compared to those with only CNCP. After adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, individuals with comorbid CNCP and MHD were significantly more likely to be prescribed opioids compared to those with only CNCP conditions. This effect varied by average daily dose and days supply: acute/low dose (1.08; 1.07-1.08); chronic/low dose (1.49; 1.49-1.50); acute/medium dose (1.07; 1.07-1.08); chronic/medium dose (1.61; 1.61-1.62); acute/high dose (1.03; 1.02-1.03); and chronic/high dose (1.53; 1.53-1.54). In individuals with CNCP, having a MHD was a strong predictor of prescription opioid use, particularly chronic use.

Respiratory events associated with concomitant opioid and sedative use among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Opioids and sedatives are commonly prescribed in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients for symptoms of dyspnoea, pain, insomnia, depression and anxiety. Older adults are advised to avoid these medications due to increased adverse events, including respiratory events. This study examines respiratory event risks associated with concomitant opioid and sedative use compared with opioid use alone in older adults with COPD. METHODS: A 5% nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries with COPD and opioid use between 2009 and 2013 was used for this retrospective cohort study. Current and past concomitant use were identified using drug dispensed within 7 days from the censored date: at respiratory event, at death, or at 12 months post index. Concomitant opioid and sedative use were categorised into no overlap (opioid only), 1 to 10, 11 to 30, 31 to 60 and >60 days of total overlap. The primary outcome was hospitalisation or emergency department (ED) visits for respiratory events (COPD exacerbations or respiratory depression). Propensity score matching was implemented and semi-competing risk models were used to address competing risk by death. RESULTS: Among 48 120 eligible beneficiaries, 1810 (16.7%) concomitant users were matched with 9050 (83.3%) opioid only users. Current concomitant use of 1 to 10, 11 to 30 and 31 to 60 days was associated with increased respiratory events (HRs (95% CI): 2.8 (1.2 to 7.3), 9.3 (4.9 to 18.2) and 5.7 (2.5 to 12.5), respectively), compared with opioid only use. Current concomitant use of >60 days or past concomitant use of ≤60 days was not significantly associated with respiratory events. Consistent findings were found in sensitivity analyses, including in subgroup analysis of non-benzodiazepine sedatives. Additionally, current concomitant use significantly increased risk of death. CONCLUSION: Short-term and medium-term current concomitant opioid and sedative use significantly increased risk of respiratory events and death in older COPD Medicare beneficiaries. Long-term past concomitant users, however, demonstrated lower risks of these outcomes, possibly reflecting a healthy user effect or developed tolerance to the effects of these agents.